Contact us:

    My Name is:

    My Email Address is:

    My Telephone Number is:

    A summary of my enquiry and what I am looking to achieve is:

    Infringement: copyright in photos

    Europe’s highest court has said a German secondary school infringed a photographer’s copyright after it re-published one of his pictures despite the fact the photographer had already given permission for the photo to appear online – a decision likely to have wide implications for future online copyright disputes.

    The Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) said posting a photo requires the permission of the original author, even if they have already given consent for it to appear elsewhere.

    In Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Dirk Renckhoff, the CJEU was asked to rule on the question of whether the inclusion of a work freely accessible to all internet users with the consent of the copyright holder on a new publicly accessible website constitutes a making available of that work to the public within the meaning of EU Directive 2001/29, also known as the InfoSoc Directive.

    The dispute was between photographer Dirk Renckhoff and North Rhine-Westphalia school Gesamtschule de Waltrop.

    Renckhoff authorised the operators of a travel website to publish one of his photographs.

    A pupil at the school then downloaded the photo to illustrate a presentation and the school published the photo on its website.

    Renckhoff brought a case before Germany’s Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) seeking an order prohibiting the reproduction of the photo and damages of €400 (£358). He claimed that right of use was granted only to the travel website and that the school, by re-publishing without his consent, infringed his copyright.

    The court then asked the CJEU to interpret the directive.

    The CJEU said: ‘In the present case, the posting on one website of a photograph previously posted on another website, after it has been first copied onto a private server, must be treated as “making available” and therefore, an “act of communication”.’

    Law Society’s Gazette 9.8.18