HomeAccessibilityIndependent approachTurnaround timeCommunication skillsFee structures
solicitors -  commercial legal work

Asbestosis
Building disputes
Compensation claims
Contract advice
Conveyancing
Debt recovery
Discrimination
Dismissal law
Employment
Harassment
Injury claims
Insurance
Libel
Litigation
Medical negligence
Negligence (general)
Planning
Professional negligence
Redundancy
Unfair dismissal
Wills & probate

Libel - medical reports - unauthorised disclosure of confidential material - justification

[Defamation Act 1952 s.5.]
C brought a claim in libel alleging that a psychiatric report prepared by D, a forensic psychiatrist, for the purpose of assessing the viability of a potential personal injury claim and containing a number of allegedly defamatory statements, had been disclosed to her GP and a consultant psychiatrist without her consent, and had consequently become part of her National Health Service records. D, maintaining that C had agreed to be referred to the consultant psychiatrist, submitted that all but one of the statements made in the report were true and that, pursuant to the Defamation Act 1952 s.5, her defence of justification should not fail merely because she had failed to prove that one point.

Held, allowing the claim in part, that (1) the psychiatric report contained defamatory statements and the publication of those statements had been unauthorised. D succeeded, however, in her claim of justification because the statement proven to be untrue had not caused significantly greater damage to C than those statements proved to be true, and (2) implicit in the commissioning of the psychiatric report was a fundamental duty of confidentiality. The court was entitled to award C damages in excess of a nominal sum for the significant mental distress caused by that breach of confidentiality, notwithstanding that the information had not been used in a manner detrimental to her, Bliss v. South East Thames RHA [1987] I.C.R. 700, [1987] C.L.Y. 1303 not applied and X (HA)v. Y [1988] 2 All E.R. 648, [1988] C.L.Y. 2859 considered.

CORNELIUS v. DE TARANTO [2001] E.M.L.R. 12, Moorland, J., QBD.

"Current Law" April 2001

E-mail us with details of your enquiry on libel-claims@humphreys.co.uk
Include your telephone number,
fax number and address.

Tel (0117) (international +44 117) 929 2662 
Fax (0117) (international +44 117) 929 2722




Relevant material

Defamation - no reasonable cause
 
Defamation - claimant's particulars of claim struck out
 
Libel - Limitation Act 1980
 
How to avoid libel and defamation
 
Defamation - Elements of a Claim
 
Reputation
 
Razor chief didn't like what he saw in Mirror
 
Libel - medical reports - unauthorised disclosure of confidential material - justification
 
GIVING GUIDANCE TO JURIES IN ASSESSING DAMAGES FOR LIBEL
 
Defamation - media and entertainment - damages
 
Gagging orders on media
 


Humphreys & Co., solicitors Bristol



Click here for information about the work we do for commercial clients.

© Copyright Humphreys & Co., solicitors

Home Page