HomeAccessibilityIndependent approachTurnaround timeCommunication skillsFee structures
solicitors -  commercial legal work

Asbestosis
Building disputes
Compensation claims
Contract advice
Conveyancing
Debt recovery
Discrimination
Dismissal law
Employment
Harassment
Injury claims
Insurance
Libel
Litigation
Medical negligence
Negligence (general)
Planning
Professional negligence
Redundancy
Unfair dismissal
Wills & probate

Libel - Limitation Act 1980. 

Claimants wished to sue Channel 4 for defamatory programme broadcast on 26th May 1998. Claim not brought within a year and was therefore statute barred. High Court Master dismissed application to disapply statutory limitation period. Claimants appealed. Circumstances in which limitation period would be disapplied. Whether it was equitable to allow the case to proceed. In view of balance of prejudice, reasons for and length of delay and effect on cogency of evidence, not equitable to allow case to proceed. Appeal dismissed. Hink & Anr v. Channel 4 Television. Queen's bench Division. Morland J. 03/03/00.

"Law Alert"

E-mail us with details of your enquiry on libel-claims@humphreys.co.uk
Include your telephone number,
fax number and address.

Tel (0117) (international +44 117) 929 2662 
Fax (0117) (international +44 117) 929 2722




Relevant material

Defamation - no reasonable cause
 
Defamation - claimant's particulars of claim struck out
 
Libel - Limitation Act 1980
 
How to avoid libel and defamation
 
Defamation - Elements of a Claim
 
Reputation
 
Razor chief didn't like what he saw in Mirror
 
Libel - medical reports - unauthorised disclosure of confidential material - justification
 
GIVING GUIDANCE TO JURIES IN ASSESSING DAMAGES FOR LIBEL
 
Defamation - media and entertainment - damages
 
Gagging orders on media
 


Humphreys & Co., solicitors Bristol



Click here for information about the work we do for commercial clients.

© Copyright Humphreys & Co., solicitors

Home Page