Asbestosis - Mesothelioma
Building disputes
Compensation claims
Contract advice
Conveyancing
Conveyancing (shared ownership, part buy/rent)
Debt recovery
Discrimination
Dismissal law
Education issues
Employment
Harassment & Privacy
Injury claims
Insurance
Libel
Litigation
Litigation (property)
Medical negligence
Negligence (general)
Planning
Probate & inheritance (contested)
Probate administration
Professional negligence
Redundancy
Unfair dismissal
Various third party links
Approach to costs
Solicitors at Humphreys & Co. always aim to approach legal work in a financially-disciplined way. We offer competitive rates. Our charging approach is both transparent and geared to the options open to our clients. Our solicitors generally charge by reference to time spent but we can often agree fixed fees for specific work or in some cases risk-adjusted funding structures.

Send us a summary of your circumstances and objectives for a quick response.
HEAD TEACHERS : LIBEL : SCHOOLS : STATEMENTS IN OPEN COURT
A statement in open court was made in proceedings for defamation following various allegations made about the claimants in relation to their running of a school.
A statement in open court was made in a libel action brought by the claimants against the defendant (N). The claimants were the director of education, the head teacher, and the chairman of the governors of a school. N made various allegations about the school, including a formal complaint to the General Teaching Council in which he alleged that the head teacher had obtained an excessive management fee from a company set up by the school to run its income-generating operations because he was a close friend of the chairman of the governors. N also published an item on the website of the local branch of the National Union of Teachers in which he suggested that those who ran the school failed to provide proper training and supervision for newly qualified teachers. The allegations were completely untrue and unfounded. N accepted that the allegations were based on false information and apologised publicly to the claimants. He agreed to pay them damages along with legal costs. Permission to withdraw the record was requested.
Statement issued in open court
Judgment: Approved - 3 pages
(1) MCLAUGHLIN (2) MARTIN (3) DAVIES v NEWALL (2010)
QBD (Tugendhat J) 15/4/2010

“Lawtel”: 26.4.10



Humphreys & Co., solicitors Bristol

Accessibility
We take instructions from UK & international clients. Our independent lawyers are available by email, telephone & fax. With central Bristol offices we are just 90 minutes from London by road or rail and 15 minutes from Bristol International Airport. We can travel to meetings if required.

Independent approach
We are an independent professional law firm here, not a legal factory turning out mass-produced products. In our experience, determined case-handling is more likely to produce effective results.

Turnaround time
Solicitors at Humphreys & Co. look to input not only careful legal work and precision but also the determination to keep matters moving. They aim to work in clients' real interests with energy and pragmatism.

Communication skills
Solicitors at Humphreys & Co. always try to open up the legal process by giving advice and explaining options to clients in a concise and straightforward way, identifying clear courses of action whatever the technical or legal complexities of the subject.
Solicitors authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority of England & Wales under no.62944
Change to our Commercial Work section or go to our Home Page lawyers@humphreys.co.uk © copyright Humphreys & Co. Solicitors