HomeAccessibilityIndependent approachTurnaround timeCommunication skillsFee structures
solicitors - commercial legal work

Arbitration & mediation
Assets/shares buy/sell
Business start ups
Commercial & transactions
Company law & compliance
Competition law (UK & EU)
Confidentiality & privacy
Construction & building
Contracts drafting
Conveyancing (commercial)
Copyright (infringement & licensing)
Debt recovery & winding up
Designs (registration & infringement)
Directors' duties & liabilities
E-commerce contracts
Employment (contracts, regulations & claims)
Franchising
Intellectual property
Joint ventures
Libel (defamation)
Licensing (premises)
Litigation (commercial)
Music & entertainment
Negligence (general)
Partnerships
Passing-off claims
Patents (infringement)
Planning representation
Professional (regulatory)
Professional negligence
Reinsurance & insurance
Shareholders
Software (licensing)
Sports contracts
Trade marks (trademarks)

TRADE MARK - REGISTRATION - DISTINCTIVENESS OF TRADE MARK "DIANA, PRINCESS OF WALES"

S and M, the executrices of the estate of Diana, Princess of Wales, applied to register the words DIANA, PRINCESS OF WALES as a trade mark to control trade in memorabilia and commemorative items bearing Diana's name. They contended that, following her death, use of the name in connection with any product would be taken by the public to be authorised by the memorial fund or the estate.

Held, refusing the application, that (1) as a living person could not own the rights to their own name, Diana, Princess of Wales, had no exclusive right to use her name for commercial purposes when she was alive, ELVIS PRESLEY Trade Marks [1999] R.P.C 567, [1999] C.L.Y. 3574 followed; (2) a name unique to a particular person did not of itself have distinctive character as a trade mark. The essential function of a trade mark was to guarantee that the items bearing it had originated under the control of a single undertaking responsible for their quality. Unless, therefore, such control could be shown, the use of a famous name to endorse a product was not a trade mark use. In the instant case, the average consumer would not have expected all commemorative items bearing Diana's name to be marketed under the control of a single undertaking. The fact that the estate had resorted to additional means of denoting official authorisation, namely the use of logo and hallmark suggested that it was not confident that the use of the name alone would guarantee a trade connection between the goods and the estate. Accordingly, at the date of the application the words DIANA PRINCESS OF WALES did not have the distinctive character required for a trade mark and were excluded from registration by the Trade Marks Act 1994 s.3(1)(b).

DIANA, PRINCESS OF WALES TRADE MARK [2001] E.T.M.R. 25, Judge not specified, TMR

"Current Law" May 2001

E-mail us with details of your enquiry on trade-marks@humphreys.co.uk
Include your telephone number,
fax number and address.

Tel (0117) (international +44 117) 929 2662 
Fax (0117) (international +44 117) 929 2722




Relevant Material



Humphreys & Co., solicitors Bristol



Also recommended by The Legal 500 Europe, Middle East and Africa 2009 - 2010.


Click here for information about the work we do for private clients.

© Copyright Humphreys & Co. Solicitors

Home Page