HomeAccessibilityIndependent approachTurnaround timeCommunication skillsFee structures
solicitors -  commercial legal work

Arbitration
Assets/shares buy/sell
Commercial advice
Company law
Company start ups
Competition law
Confidentiality
Construction & building
Contract advice
Conveyancing
Copyright
Debt recovery
Design rights
Directors duties
Discrimination
Dismissal law
E-commerce
Employment
European law
Franchising
Infringement
Insurance
Intellectual property
Joint ventures
Libel
Licensing (premises)
Litigation (commercial)
Merchandising
Music & entertainment
Negligence (general)
Partnerships
Passing-off
Patents
Planning
Professional negligence
Redundacy
Reinsurance
Shareholders
Software
Sponsorship
Sports contracts
Trade Marks (Trademarks)
Unfair dismissal

TRADE MARK - REGISTRATION - DISTINCTIVENESS OF TRADE MARK "DIANA, PRINCESS OF WALES"

S and M, the executrices of the estate of Diana, Princess of Wales, applied to register the words DIANA, PRINCESS OF WALES as a trade mark to control trade in memorabilia and commemorative items bearing Diana's name. They contended that, following her death, use of the name in connection with any product would be taken by the public to be authorised by the memorial fund or the estate.

Held, refusing the application, that (1) as a living person could not own the rights to their own name, Diana, Princess of Wales, had no exclusive right to use her name for commercial purposes when she was alive, ELVIS PRESLEY Trade Marks [1999] R.P.C 567, [1999] C.L.Y. 3574 followed; (2) a name unique to a particular person did not of itself have distinctive character as a trade mark. The essential function of a trade mark was to guarantee that the items bearing it had originated under the control of a single undertaking responsible for their quality. Unless, therefore, such control could be shown, the use of a famous name to endorse a product was not a trade mark use. In the instant case, the average consumer would not have expected all commemorative items bearing Diana's name to be marketed under the control of a single undertaking. The fact that the estate had resorted to additional means of denoting official authorisation, namely the use of logo and hallmark suggested that it was not confident that the use of the name alone would guarantee a trade connection between the goods and the estate. Accordingly, at the date of the application the words DIANA PRINCESS OF WALES did not have the distinctive character required for a trade mark and were excluded from registration by the Trade Marks Act 1994 s.3(1)(b).

DIANA, PRINCESS OF WALES TRADE MARK [2001] E.T.M.R. 25, Judge not specified, TMR

"Current Law" May 2001

E-mail us with details of your enquiry on trade-marks@humphreys.co.uk
Include your telephone number,
fax number and address.

Tel (0117) (international +44 117) 929 2662 
Fax (0117) (international +44 117) 929 2722




Relevant material




What does a trademark do?
 
TRADEMARK REGISTRATION
 
Community Trade Mark
 
Threshold of registrability lowered
 
Flowchart example (UK)
 
EUROPEAN REGISTRATION
 
European Trade Marks Office (OHIM)
 
Names can be trademarked even if common
 
CHINA : Trademark Gets Lost in Translation
 
Trade marks
 
Trade marks - Community trade marks - confusion - phonetic similarities
 
PRACTICE DIRECTIONS
 
TRADE MARK - REGISTRATION - DISTINCTIVENESS OF TRADE MARK "DIANA, PRINCESS OF WALES"
 
REVOCATION OF TRADE MARK REGISTRATIONS
 
Registrability of slogans as trade marks
 
TRADE MARKS - CONFUSION - UNITED - PRIOR REGISTRATION OF MANCHESTER UNITED
 
Grants towards legal costs: IP Wales
 
Bad faith test for trademark
 
Intellectual property - genuine use - market share
 


Humphreys & Co., solicitors Bristol



Click here for information about the work we do for private clients.

© Copyright Humphreys & Co., solicitors

Home Page