HomeAccessibilityIndependent approachTurnaround timeCommunication skillsFee structures
solicitors - commercial legal work

Arbitration & mediation
Assets/shares buy/sell
Business start ups
Commercial & transactions
Company law & compliance
Competition law (UK & EU)
Confidentiality & privacy
Construction & building
Contracts drafting
Conveyancing (commercial)
Copyright (infringement & licensing)
Debt recovery & winding up
Designs (registration & infringement)
Directors' duties & liabilities
E-commerce contracts
Employment (contracts, regulations & claims)
Franchising
Intellectual property
Joint ventures
Libel (defamation)
Licensing (premises)
Litigation (commercial)
Music & entertainment
Negligence (general)
Partnerships
Passing-off claims
Patents (infringement)
Planning representation
Professional (regulatory)
Professional negligence
Reinsurance & insurance
Shareholders
Software (licensing)
Sports contracts
Trade marks (trademarks)

Trade marks - Community trade marks - confusion - phonetic similarities

    [Council Regulation 40/94 on the Community trade mark Art.8(1)(b).]S applied to register the words BLACK BULL as a Community trade mark for goods in Classes 25, 32 and 33 (clothing, headgear and footwear, non alcoholic and alcoholic drinks) and Class 42 (various hospitality services). RB opposed the application on the basis of its prior national registrations of the trademark RED BULL. R argued that the mark BLACK BULL was similar to its marks, and related to the same goods, in terms of Council Regulation 40/94 on the Community trade mark Art.8(1)(b).
    Held, allowing the opposition in part, but allowing registration for use in Classes 33 and 42, that the two marks shared close phonetic similarities and the word BULL was not usually found in relation to Classes 25 and 32. The dominant nature of the word meant that the marks were similar. Of the national registrations relied on by RB, only Irish marks for goods in Classes 25 and 32 were relevant and these showed that the public would be likely to believe the goods had a shared source, giving rise to the risk of confusion.
    SCOTTISH & NEWCASTLE PLC'S TRADE MARK APPLICATION [2000] E.T.M.R. 1143, Tomas de las Heras, Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Opposition Division).

"Current Law" February 2001

E-mail us with details of your enquiry on trade-marks@humphreys.co.uk
Include your telephone number,
fax number and address.

Tel (0117) (international +44 117) 929 2662 
Fax (0117) (international +44 117) 929 2722




Relevant Material



Humphreys & Co., solicitors Bristol



Also recommended by The Legal 500 Europe, Middle East and Africa 2009 - 2010.


Click here for information about the work we do for private clients.

© Copyright Humphreys & Co. Solicitors

Home Page