Arbitration & mediation
Assets/shares buy/sell
Business start ups
Commercial & transactions
Commercial property
Company law & compliance
Competition law (UK & EU)
Confidentiality & privacy
Construction & building
Contracts drafting
Copyright (infringement & licensing)
Debt recovery & winding up
Designs (registration & infringement)
Directors' duties & liabilities
E-commerce contracts
Employment (contracts, regulations & claims)
Franchising
Insurance & reinsurance
Intellectual property
Joint ventures
Libel (defamation)
Licensing (premises)
Litigation (commercial)
Music & entertainment
Negligence (general)
Partnerships
Passing-off claims
Patents (infringement)
Planning representation
Professional (regulatory)
Professional negligence
Shareholders
Software (licensing)
Sports contracts
Trademark infringement
Trademark registration & brands
Approach to costs
Solicitors at Humphreys & Co. always aim to approach legal work in a financially-disciplined way. We offer competitive rates. Our charging approach is both transparent and geared to the options open to our clients. Our solicitors generally charge by reference to time spent but we can often agree fixed fees for specific work or in some cases risk-adjusted funding structures.

Send us a summary of your circumstances and objectives for a quick response.

Trade marks - Community trade marks - confusion - phonetic similarities

    [Council Regulation 40/94 on the Community trade mark Art.8(1)(b).]S applied to register the words BLACK BULL as a Community trade mark for goods in Classes 25, 32 and 33 (clothing, headgear and footwear, non alcoholic and alcoholic drinks) and Class 42 (various hospitality services). RB opposed the application on the basis of its prior national registrations of the trademark RED BULL. R argued that the mark BLACK BULL was similar to its marks, and related to the same goods, in terms of Council Regulation 40/94 on the Community trade mark Art.8(1)(b).
    Held, allowing the opposition in part, but allowing registration for use in Classes 33 and 42, that the two marks shared close phonetic similarities and the word BULL was not usually found in relation to Classes 25 and 32. The dominant nature of the word meant that the marks were similar. Of the national registrations relied on by RB, only Irish marks for goods in Classes 25 and 32 were relevant and these showed that the public would be likely to believe the goods had a shared source, giving rise to the risk of confusion.
    SCOTTISH & NEWCASTLE PLC'S TRADE MARK APPLICATION [2000] E.T.M.R. 1143, Tomas de las Heras, Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Opposition Division).

"Current Law" February 2001



Relevant Material



Humphreys & Co., solicitors Bristol

Accessibility
We take instructions from UK & international clients. Our independent lawyers are available by email, telephone & fax. With central Bristol offices we are just 90 minutes from London by road or rail and 15 minutes from Bristol International Airport. We can travel to meetings if required.

Independent approach
We are an independent professional law firm here, not a legal factory turning out mass-produced products. In our experience, determined case-handling is more likely to produce effective results.

Turnaround time
Solicitors at Humphreys & Co. look to input not only careful legal work and precision but also the determination to keep matters moving. They aim to work in clients' real interests with energy and pragmatism.

Communication skills
Solicitors at Humphreys & Co. always try to open up the legal process by giving advice and explaining options to clients in a concise and straightforward way, identifying clear courses of action whatever the technical or legal complexities of the subject.
Solicitors authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority of England & Wales under no.62944
Change to our Personal Legal Affairs section or go to our Home Page lawyers@humphreys.co.uk © copyright Humphreys & Co. Solicitors