HomeAccessibilityIndependent approachTurnaround timeCommunication skillsFee structures
solicitors - commercial legal work

Arbitration & mediation
Assets/shares buy/sell
Business start ups
Commercial & transactions
Company law & compliance
Competition law (UK & EU)
Confidentiality & privacy
Construction & building
Contracts drafting
Conveyancing (commercial)
Copyright (infringement & licensing)
Debt recovery & winding up
Designs (registration & infringement)
Directors' duties & liabilities
E-commerce contracts
Employment (contracts, regulations & claims)
Franchising
Intellectual property
Joint ventures
Libel (defamation)
Licensing (premises)
Litigation (commercial)
Music & entertainment
Negligence (general)
Partnerships
Passing-off claims
Patents (infringement)
Planning representation
Professional (regulatory)
Professional negligence
Reinsurance & insurance
Shareholders
Software (licensing)
Sports contracts
Trade marks (trademarks)

Passing off and trade mark infringement in kulfi ice cream dispute

In a dispute between manufacturers and retailers of kulfi ice cream, the High Court has upheld the claimant's allegations of trade mark infringement and passing off.

Tubzee Limited, which had traded since 2000, owned several trade marks including a UK trade mark with a stylised "K" (including an elongated dropped tail) and a Community mark featuring two traditional India matka pots pouring a white liquid over ice cubes. Safron Food Limited originally traded under a get-up that had little in common with Tubzee's packaging. However, following a re-design in 2006, Safron's ice cream was sold under a design that included a "K" with a dropped tail and two circular pots pouring a white liquid (the key features).

The High Court rejected Safron's claims that they had failed to appreciate the similarities between the appearances of the respective ice creams.

The court found that there was a likelihood of confusion between the parties' products under section 10(2) of the Trade Marks Act 1994.
 
In relation to passing off, the court held that Tubzee had goodwill in its product's get-up; that Safron's use of the key features in its get-up amounted to misrepresentation; and that Tubzee had suffered some damage as a result of Safron's actions. Despite the earlier resignation of two of Safron's directors, the court found that they were de jure or quasi directors.
 
As a result, they were found to have procured Safron to commit tortous acts and were held personally liable for passing off and trade mark infringement.

"Practical Law" 10.10.08

E-mail us with details of your enquiry on passing-off@humphreys.co.uk
Include your telephone number,
fax number and address.

Tel (0117) (international +44 117) 929 2662 
Fax (0117) (international +44 117) 929 2722




Relevant Material



Humphreys & Co., solicitors Bristol



Also recommended by The Legal 500 Europe, Middle East and Africa 2009 - 2010.


Click here for information about the work we do for private clients.

© Copyright Humphreys & Co. Solicitors

Home Page