
|
|
Joint authorship (Beckingham v Hodgens and others; Chancery Division; 2nd July 2002)The Bluebells was a pop group who had a hit in 1984 with the song "Young at Heart". The song was used in an advertisement in 1993 and enjoyed a new and greater popularity. The claimant, B, was a professional fiddle player who was hired as a session musician when the song was recorded in 1984. His case was that he wrote the violin part for the song without any significant input from the band members, and that his contribution was sufficient to make him a joint author of the resulting copyright musical work, alternatively a sole author of his part. The first defendant, H, the leader of the Bluebells, challenged B's version of events. His case was that he explained more or less exactly what he wanted B to play. H also argued that the violin part did not make a significant and original contribution to the song, so that it was not a work of joint authorship, that there was no intention to create a work of joint authorship and that the violin part was not a work in its own right because it was not sufficiently original. There was no basis in the English cases or the statutory definition for the requirement of a joint intention to create a joint work. In this case the song was created by a collaboration between H and B in furtherance of a common design. The violin part made a significant and original contribution of the right kind of skill and labour to the song and accordingly B was a joint author of the copyright in that work. The incorporation of a new part into the song in the way described did not make B's contribution separate. From 1984 B knowingly permitted the Bluebells to assume that he would make no claim to a share in the royalty income from the song.
Different considerations applied, however, in relation to the second success of the song in 1993. There was no reason why B was not entitled at that stage to claim his share and revoke his implied licence to use the song. It was not unconscionable to revoke the licence in 1993. Nor was it unconscionable for B to assert his rights in this action. B first asserted his right to be identified as an author of the song for the purposes of s78 of the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 by an instrument in writing dated 15 November 1999.
"Intellectual Property Newsletter" August 2002
|
|
Relevant material Infringement of copyright in software Originality of garment of design Joint authorship Copyright infringement - song lyrics LUDLOW MUSIC INC. v. ROBBIE WILLIAMS COPYRIGHT - MUSICAL WORKS ROYALTY ACTION AGAINST MUSICIANS' UNION Enforcing copyright abroad Industrial designs - international registration |
|||
![]() |
|
Click here for
information about the work we do for private clients. © Copyright Humphreys & Co., solicitors
|