HomeAccessibilityIndependent approachTurnaround timeCommunication skillsFee structures
solicitors -  commercial legal work

Arbitration
Assets/shares buy/sell
Commercial advice
Company law
Company start ups
Competition law
Confidentiality
Construction & building
Contract advice
Conveyancing
Copyright
Debt recovery
Design rights
Directors duties
Discrimination
Dismissal law
E-commerce
Employment
European law
Franchising
Infringement
Insurance
Intellectual property
Joint ventures
Libel
Licensing (premises)
Litigation (commercial)
Merchandising
Music & entertainment
Negligence (general)
Partnerships
Passing-off
Patents
Planning
Professional negligence
Redundacy
Reinsurance
Shareholders
Software
Sponsorship
Sports contracts
Trade Marks (Trademarks)
Unfair dismissal

Implications of a finding of shadow directorship

Many of the statutory controls over directors have been extended to shadow directors. Therefore:

  • shadow directors have a duty to have regard for the interests of the company's employees (s 309 of the Act);
  • shareholders must approve shadow directors' employment contracts which have a duration of more than five years (s 319 of the Act);

  • the statutory provisions dealing with substantial property transactions between shadow directors and the company will apply (s 320 of the Act);

  • if the company has one shareholder only, any agreement entered into with the shadow directors must be recorded in writing (s 322B of the Act);

  • the statutory provisions in relation to loans to shadow directors will apply (ss 330 to 346 of the Act);

  • shadow directors must declare an interest in a contract or proposed contract with the company (s 317(8) of the Act);

  • shadow directors are prohibited from dealing with call options in the company (s 323 of the Act);

  • shadow directors have an obligation to disclose a shareholding in the company;

  • shadow directors can be found liable for wrongful trading (s 214 of the Insolvency Act 1986); this provision allows a company's liquidator to seek a contribution from shadow directors if the company goes into insolvent liquidation and prior to the insolvency the shadow directors knew, or ought to have concluded, that there was no reasonable prospect that the company would avoid going into insolvent liquidation; and

  • the Secretary of State may impose disqualification orders on shadow directors (Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986; ss 6 to 9 and 22(4).

"New Law Journal" 16th November 2001

E-mail us with details of your enquiry on directors-duties@humphreys.co.uk
Include your telephone number,
fax number and address.

Tel (0117) (international +44 117) 929 2662 
Fax (0117) (international +44 117) 929 2722




Relevant material




DIRECTOR LIABLE FOR DIVERTING CORPORATE OPPORTUNITY
 
NO VALIDATION OF DIRECTOR'S ACT
 
Implications of a finding of shadow directorship
 
Directors' rights
 
HOW TO BE A DIRECTOR
 
DIRECTORS' DISQUALIFICATION
 
DIRECTOR IS BANNED AND ORDERED TO REPAY £2M
 
DIRECTORS - FIDUCIARY DUTY - DISHONEST DIVERSION OF ASSETS TO OFFSHORE COMPANY
 
Directors
 
UNCERTAINTY SHROUDS DIRECTORS' DUTIES
 
Secretarial help needed
 
Disqualifying unfit directors
 
Disqualified director fined £200,000
 
Directors disqualification proceedings
 


Humphreys & Co., solicitors Bristol



Click here for information about the work we do for private clients.

© Copyright Humphreys & Co., solicitors

Home Page