HomeAccessibilityIndependent approachTurnaround timeCommunication skillsFee structures
solicitors - commercial legal work

Arbitration & mediation
Assets/shares buy/sell
Business start ups
Commercial & transactions
Company law & compliance
Competition law (UK & EU)
Confidentiality & privacy
Construction & building
Contracts drafting
Conveyancing (commercial)
Copyright (infringement & licensing)
Debt recovery & winding up
Designs (registration & infringement)
Directors' duties & liabilities
E-commerce contracts
Employment (contracts, regulations & claims)
Franchising
Intellectual property
Joint ventures
Libel (defamation)
Licensing (premises)
Litigation (commercial)
Music & entertainment
Negligence (general)
Partnerships
Passing-off claims
Patents (infringement)
Planning representation
Professional (regulatory)
Professional negligence
Reinsurance & insurance
Shareholders
Software (licensing)
Sports contracts
Trade marks (trademarks)

Company law – contracts

 

Agreements: consideration: dispute resolution: earnouts: sales: share: shares: construction of share sale agreement: disputes referable to independent accountant: earn-out consideration

 

A share sale agreement had not provided that disputes over accounts were referable to an independent accountant.

 

The claimant buyer (B) sought declarations as to the powers of an independent accountant.  By a share sale agreement B had bought and the defendant (S) had sold all the issued share capital in a company.  The agreement provided that earn-out consideration payable to S was to be calculated from particular audited accounts and that certain disputes between the parties were to be resolved by an independent accountant.   B sent copies of draft accounts to S stating that the auditors had confirmed that those accounts were in their finalised form.  B proceeded to calculate the earn-out consideration on the basis of those accounts.  Later B forwarded accounts signed by the auditors for the same period that revealed a material difference in profit to the first accounts.  S argued that it was within the independent accountant’s remit to resolve the dispute over the two accounts and that the finalised accounts for the purpose of calculating earn-out consideration were the first set of accounts.

 

HELD: Disputes as to the audited accounts were not included in the agreement as matters referable to the accountant.  The terms of the agreement provided for a remedy in damages where there was such a dispute.  Accordingly the accountant did not have jurisdiction to deal with alleged errors and irregularities in the audited accounts.

 

Declaration granted.

 

Brambles Foods Group Ltd v Pearce & Ors (2005)

 

Ch D (Judge Raynor) 22.2.2005

 

“Lawtel”: 28.2.05

E-mail us with details of your enquiry on company-law@humphreys.co.uk
Include your telephone number,
fax number and address.

Tel (0117) (international +44 117) 929 2662 
Fax (0117) (international +44 117) 929 2722




Relevant Material



Humphreys & Co., solicitors Bristol



Also recommended by The Legal 500 Europe, Middle East and Africa 2009 - 2010.


Click here for information about the work we do for private clients.

© Copyright Humphreys & Co. Solicitors

Home Page